28 May 2009

Testing of My Faith



Chioke,

Yes, I noticed that you set out to make some points* about my previous blog post. In this post, my goal is to clear up some of your claims about what I believe and I would like to make some points of my own. I’ve noticed that I’ve missed some things that I wanted to say in my previous responses, so this time I will be careful to hit everything by being a little more systematic about it.

*For those who want to read what Chioke wrote click HERE.

I watched the video that you linked to your previous post “A girl like me” (Doll test). First let me say that I don’t disagree with this video on any particular point. This problem does not only pertain to African Americans, but people in every country that I’ve ever visited, and not just black people but Asians, and whites as well. While in the Philippines I found that guys preferred lighter skinned Filipino women, and in Mongolia girls and guys alike would wear long sleeves and long trousers when it was hot outside, because they don’t want to look like they’re from the countryside. In China, most of the advertisements seemed to have very light skinned Chinese women in the pictures. In Zambia, some women try to use certain lotions to lighten the skin. In America, white people spend plenty of time and money tanning in salons and at the beach, or in their backyard. This problem of one skin tone being valued over another dates back as far as Solomon’s Song of Songs. When one reads Song of Songs 1:5,6 it seems obvious that dark skin was not usually preferred at the time and place of the author.

5 Dark am I, yet lovely,
O daughters of Jerusalem,
Dark like the tents of Kedar,
Like the tent curtains of Solomon.
6 Do not stare at me because I am dark,
Because I am darkened by the sun.
My mother’s sons were angry with me and made me take care of the
Vineyards;
My own vineyard I have neglected.

Now, I find it hard to believe that a white Jesus has anything to do with the woman in this story, or with Mongolians who are maybe 1% Christian. Often, people simply want what they cannot have; this is a problem of all humans, even you have admitted to wanting darker skin while you were in Uganda. This problem has existed well before Jesus was born and of course before his image was changed to that of a hippie white guy.

Women want bigger breasts, people with straight hair want curly hair, and people with curly hair want it to be straight. People dye their hair all colors, get nose jobs, braces on their teeth, piercings and tattoos. Africans want to be fatter, Americans want to be thinner, Chinese people go through a painful surgery to be a few inches taller, hoping it will give them an edge over someone else in the job market. Dutch people, well they’re just Dutch and proud of it. Men want to be women, and women want to be men. People get contacts that change their eye color. I believe that every human was born for a reason; purposefully in the time and place they were born. Most of us though want to change what we can’t change, that is who we are. Some go as far as to drastically change their appearance, in hopes to find something, something they believe they need and don’t have.

Psalm 139:13-16
13 For you created my inmost being;
You knit me together in my mother’s
Womb.
14 I praise you because I am fearfully and
wonderfully made;
your works are wonderful,
I know that full well.
15 My frame was not hidden from you
when I was made in the secret
place.
When I was woven together in the
Depths of the earth,
16 your eyes saw my unformed body.
All the days ordained for me
Were written in your book
Before one of them came to be.

Now, moving on to the “Let’s work together on this and reference scientific methods less.” First, it seems as though you either missed my point, or just failed to address what I was really getting at. The point was and is, that we live in an unbelieving world (mostly referring to the western world) where we will chose anything over the numinous. I would also like to point out that if Dr. Dawkins is a man who believes that good explanations must have empirical content, then I don’t think he would be so sold out on a theory that can’t be scientifically proven any more than God the Almighty can be. Yes, you read that right; I do believe that God cannot be scientifically proven, on the flip side, I do believe that it’s impossible to prove that He doesn’t exist. I’m certainly not looking for Mr. Wizard or Bill N. the science guy to agree with me so that I can have more credibility. One has to believe or not, accept or reject. I think many scientists and philosophers have come to the conclusion that God cannot be proven or disproven, and yet they chose not to believe. Again, this is because Darwin’s theory, aliens, etc. do not challenge or threaten, so it’s easier to chose not to believe in the God who created the heavens and the earth and then spoke to His creation about Himself and how He would like those who want to believe in Him to live. Instead they put their faith in other theories or truths that can’t be proven.

1 Corinthians 1:18-21
18 For the message of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God. 19 For it is written:
“I will destroy the wisdom of the wise;
the intelligence of the intelligent I
will frustrate.”
20 Where is the wise man? Where is the scholar? Where is the philosopher of this age? Has not God made foolish the wisdom of this world? 21 For since in the wisdom of God the world through its wisdom did not know him, God was pleased through the foolishness of what was preached to save those who believe.

I will have to admit, however that I haven’t read much about the philosophy of the medieval era on into the enlightenment age or even into postmodern, or the information age (whatever you want to call where we are now). So, when you mention cats like Aquinas, Anselm, Augustine, Kant and his homies, then I can’t say too much on the subject. It does seem to me though that since philosophy has left behind Christian theism, that the worldviews have been almost continually shifting as people realize that the current worldview doesn’t quite work. I simply have a hard time believing that “The truth” can just keep on changing from one age to the next simply because we want it to. Again, I apologize; I don’t have my philosophy merit badge (I am an Eagle Scout though). The main question that comes to mind when you talk about that is, what do you mean “Kant and his homies won?” Won what? I hope you don’t mean they won the world to Atheism? Billions of people in the world, including most Africans believe in a spiritual realm and in God or many Gods, yet somehow a few philosophers are smarter than the rest of the world and have some knowledge that the rest of the world doesn’t. Oh, and People writing about what they believe and facing criticisms, no problem, it’s a 2000-year-old problem for Christians yet we are still here.

Mathew 5:11-12
11 Blessed are you when people insult you, persecute you and falsely say all kinds of evil against you because of me. 12 Rejoice and be glad, because great is your reward in heaven, for in the same way they persecuted the prophets who were before you.

Personally, I don’t have a problem with the way people search for truth. I believe that we are all searching in one way or another and that search may consist of a number of styles. Some seek to find their truth through success, money, drugs, alcohol, academia, the bible, the Quran, philosophy books, University, Scientology, Science, traditions and culture. Never have I judged one process of investigation into the nature of truth better or worse than others. We are fallible creatures and we learn and grow from our experiences and mistakes. Remember Chioke, I wasn’t raised in the church, and two thirds of my life I didn’t believe in Jesus. I thought it was all a joke. Karen broke up with me after high school, because I wasn’t a Christian.

The collection of books that you hold on to may not claim to be the authority, but anyone who sits down and publishes a book on a certain subject must believe he has some sort of authority on the topic. So, you go to the library and find books, read them and then decide if you agree with or not what that author is talking about. When you chose to believe, whether it is after further investigation or not, then you hold on to that idea and your reason and understandings of the world are shaped by that, so that is what I meant by you hold on to your own collection of books as well. The collection is simply compiled by you your professors and colleagues. I do read more books than the bible and I read books that don’t agree with my worldview, hence the reason we’ve started this series of written conversations since last year when I read Song of Lawino. The bible as you know was written by a number of authors over a stretch of at least a thousand years. Dr. Walter A. Elwell writes about the New Testament Canon, “The formation of the New Testament canon is no less enigmatic than that of the Old Testament, also being a process rather than an event.” He also mentions “In 380, we find our twenty-seven books in the familiar arrangement (taken from the Latin Vulgate) listed in the writings of Amphilocius of Iconium.” So the process of the Canon formation in the west, was pretty much wrapping up at the end of the 4th century. What’s interesting to me about his article on the matter is that as early as the 2nd century there was already collections of these same writings being formed, they were just limited and not official yet. Probably because the cost of producing such letters, we didn’t have Canon copy/fax machines yet. I’m not sure what you mean when you say “I might be talking to a straw man” but you are right, I agree that the bible does not seek any justification outside of itself.

John 1:1-5
1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. 2 He was with God in the beginning.
3 Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made. 4 In him was life, and that life was the light of men. 5 The light shines in the darkness, but the darkness has not understood it.

2 Timothy 3:16-17
16 All scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness, 17 so that the man of God may be thoroughly equipped for every good work.

What is “every good work?”

James 1:27
Religion that God our Father accepts as pure and faultless is this: to look after orphans and widows in their distress and to keep oneself from being polluted by the world.

And on to my friend’s point, who is also your friend Drew. The conversation only stops at that point, because I believe something that he does not, and I guess he was not able to handle that (we did continue to talk anyway). Unreasoned belief? Why would you say that? Here is what I know to be true, and no one that has known me longer than 10 years can disprove it. My life was a wreck, my car had been wrecked and was no more, I was living in Va. Beach with no friends to speak of and then I met a person at work who was just cool with who I was. Angry as I was, complaining all the time, nothing really to offer but a draining relationship and that girl was a Christian (no romance was involved). When Anna and I decided to hang out because we both played a bit of guitar, I asked her if he boyfriend would mind because she was wearing a small diamond ring on her wedding finger. She told me that she was not married but the ring was there as a symbol of purity, that she was waiting for marriage. I laughed at her and told her straight up that she was out of her mind. That didn’t seem to shake her at all and after a year of being friends, this girl gave me a book for my 20th birthday “Ragamuffin Gospel” by Brennon Manning. I read it in July of 1999, about half way through the book on an airplane ride to my next job; I just knew that what this guy was talking about was true. I can’t explain how or why I knew and accepted it, but I did. Since, then my life has only become better each year. It has not been easy the whole way, far from it. Challenging, but I’m more free than I was last year, and as I grow more mature, I’m sure that I will be more free than I am now. Before that I was on my way to being an alcoholic, perverted, abusive man, possibly on my way to prison for the bad decisions I was making. Unreasoned belief? I have too many reasons to believe. What I am talking about is a transformed life. Am I perfect now? No, it’s a process, and an event.

There is no way that I can understand what you feel or have to deal with when talking about the history of your ancestors. I think for the first time, I realize why you’re so adamant about preserving the traditional African cultures. The faint echoes of your heritage are precious to you, and I’m truly sorry for what has happened. I have to say though that I am not cool with slavery as a vehicle for evangelizing. I don’t read Phyllis Wheatley’s song and feel at all at ease with what happened to her or anyone who has had to undergo such a travesty. She chose those words for her own personal reasons and I can’t even begin to understand it.

I have to agree that there are forces over and above a person’s autonomy that pushes them into adopting different perspectives. You seem to think that the only force is that which is coercively spurring people into believing in Jesus Christ. Along with the Christian religious perspective is a wide range of forces; gangster rappers convincing hundreds of millions around the world that Gold chains, huge ass diamond rings, guns and violence are the way, Islam, Mormons, Atheists, Communists, advertisements, pornography, Governments, Traditional cultures that not only contain that which should be preserved but also that which oppresses and subjugates women and children, Movies (not just Hollywood, but many from Nigeria which commonly circulate the continent of Africa), and demonic forces, that which the witch doctors and traditional healers often tap into, social pressures, etc. You seem to think that because I have access to more money than the average Zambian, that I am more powerful, like being an “economically superior missionary” somehow makes me a threat to all that is Zambian culture. I realize that the color of my skin automatically brings certain thoughts upon my arrival on the scene, but I’m not out to just throw around some money and force people to change everything about their lifestyle. I believe that every culture has good, bad, and amoral in it. Just as an example, I would not tell a Tonga man that he cannot engage in polygamy, but I am not cool with the often-found neglect and abuse of women and children at the hands of men, which is socially acceptable here in this culture. I wouldn’t suggest marrying more than one woman, because my culture doesn’t readily accept it, but I assume that you would not be able to roll with spousal and child abuse as acceptable. Just a quick question, how exactly did the British force Christianity on the Zambians? If you have any sources on that, I would be interested to look into it.

Believing in God does not make one a good person. Memorizing the bible, going to church, or praying does not make one a good person any more than living a morally good life. There is no way that I am able to evaluate or judge the morality of your or anyone else’s lifestyle for that matter. You have asked me not to morally evaluate others’ life situations, yet it seems to me that you have done just that towards me and anybody like me, even to the point that you are asking me to stop living the way I live. Chioke, you have obviously deemed yourself fit to judge approximately a billion people who are alive today, not to mention all those who lived and died believing as I do in the past 2000 years.

Romans 2:1
You, therefore, have no excuse, you who pass judgment on someone else, for at whatever point you judge the other, you are condemning yourself, because you who pass judgment do the same things.

I believe you can live a very morally good life, probably even more morally good than I might be living mine. That is not beyond what I can accept. No matter how good one lives his life though, It’s not enough.

Romans 3:23
For all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God

Believing in Christ isn’t about being perfect; it’s about recognizing that we can’t reach our fullest potential without help. It’s about recognizing that the creator of the universe loved us so much that he sent himself in the form of a man to be sacrificed for our iniquities so that we could be good enough, so that we could reach our fullest potential.
Isaiah 53:1-ff
Who has believed our message and to whom has the arm of the Lord been revealed? He grew up before him like a tender shoot, and like a root out of dry ground. He had no beauty or majesty to attract us to him, nothing in his appearance that we should desire him. He was despised and rejected by men, a man of sorrows, and familiar with suffering. Like one from whom men hide their faces he was despised, and we esteemed him not.
Surely he took up our infirmities and carried our sorrows, yet we considered him stricken by God, smitten by him, and afflicted. But he was pierced for our transgressions, he was crushed for our iniquities; the punishment that brought us peace was upon him, and by his wounds we are healed. We all, like sheep, have gone astray, each of us has turned to his own way; and the Lord has laid on him the iniquity of us all.
He was oppressed and afflicted, yet he did not open his mouth; he was led like a lamb to the slaughter, and as a sheep before her shearers is silent, so he did not open his mouth. By oppression and judgment he was taken away. And who can speak of his descendants? For he was cut off from the land of the living; for the transgression of my people he was stricken. He was assigned a grave with the wicked, and with the rich in his death, though he had done no violence, nor was any deceit in his mouth.
Yet it was the Lord’s will to crush him and cause him to suffer, and though the Lord Makes his life a guilt offering, he will see his offspring and prolong his days, and the will of the Lord will prosper in his hand. After the suffering of his soul, he will see the light of life and be satisfied; by his knowledge my righteous servant will justify many, and he will bear their iniquities. Therefore I will give him a portion among the great, and he will divide the spoils with the strong, because he poured out his life unto death, and was numbered with the transgressors. For he bore the sin of many, and made intercession for the transgressors.

So, I hope this helps with some of the assumptions that you ‘ve had to make and if there is any assumptions that I’ve made about what you believe and they are not right, please set it straight. I think everyone needs to be challenged as to what they believe and why.

James 3:3
Because you know that the testing of your faith develops perseverance.

Proverbs 12:1
Whoever loves discipline loves knowledge, but he who hates correction is stupid.

Later

9 comments:

Eveline said...

Hey Nic,

From all the comments this will be the most important one. It will be the most crucial to your whole blog. Hell, maybe it will even change your life!
Here it is: I never ever met a Dutch person (including myself) who is proud of being Dutch!
:p :p

Cya
Eve
A cosmopolitan Dutchy in Macha

Question said...

Hey Nic,

So I have been following you and Chioke's conversation and wanted to interject with a few thoughts. I really appreciate your commitment to faith and to the narratives that surround that faith. It is really beautiful. One thing that I want to bring up here is the idea of historical context and how it effects power dynamics in the present. So while a white person may tan in order to become darker, they are in no way trying to become, or in danger of becoming, 'black'- they are instead adhering to a skewed beauty industry that does its best to profit on peoples insecurities. People of color, on the other hand, are historically positioned as socially inadequate because the 'norm' is white. Think about reading a novel- the character is assumed white unless it is stated that he or she is black (or any other race). It's not even about individual perspective, ie, you may not think white is the norm, but the larger social constructions place us in designated roles that we must constantly work to disrupt- but can only do so by admitting that they exist and oppress others. Skin lightening creams exist out of a history of deep oppression and this personal anxiety. And while we may have made some steps in recent years- the structures themeselves have not shifted so the steps do little more than to appease a guilty conscience. White people are still the priveledged people in the world, and so even white people who believe we should all be equal, are given certain benefits in society which allow them to come to that determination in the first place.

You say that dark skin just wasn't preferred in Uganda at the time that Song of Lawino was written. I want to challenge you to think of the question behind that statement. Well, WHY wasn't dark skin preferred if most people in the community have dark skin? You can't really answer that question with the answer 'because nobody likes what they have'- because the REASON that nobody likes what they have is socially engrained and deeply rooted in history- and Africa has a history of white colonizers coming in and forcing a way of life through force and coersion.

On that note, the image of white Jesus was created to create a 'myth' of normalcy. If Jesus is the embodiment of God and God is white, then anyone who is not, is inadequate. There's not really room for personal opinions here because the image itself goes beyond the personal- so while you may very well believe that Jesus could look like anyone, the fact that he is represented as white, leaves those who do not look like him out of the 'picture' or the 'image' of God (in which we are all supposed to be created). Why wasn't Jesus portrayed as he really was, which was most likely black? The representations work as myths that create and recreate the world. It's kind of like how studies have shown that images of super skinny and photoshopped models lead to eating disorders and self hatred in young women.

Question said...

One of the things that I got from your writings was the idea of acceptance. All of the reasons that you state for people wanting to change themselves are culturally specific (Africans want to be fatter because in poorer countries to have weight on you means you are most likely eating well and therefore have money- this has created a cultural ideal that says that fatter is more beautiful), but they all lead into a larger notion that human beings want to be accepted and acceptance in each culture has terms and conditions that one must fit. The thing is, for colonized people, the terms are often set by someone else- and this creates a whole litany of problems for the development of self identity. Who should I be, if the person that I am can never, ever be the image of what I see as powerful and ideal?

You know how you are taken seriously by people immediately in Zambia because you are white and from the west? I have lived in multiple countries in Africa and have always found this to be the case. This is a product of post colonization. Your skin color or passport (which ultimately translates to skin color, since its all a metaphor anyway) allows you to set the terms in any situation. Even if you chose not to, or try to avoid setting the terms, the very possibility that you can, makes the western aid workers position a dangerous one. It's not that we WILL impose our beliefs on another, but the fact that we COULD, which colors every interaction we will ever have in Africa. We are always in danger of imposing our ideals and beliefs upon someone else, even if we don't mean to, and even if we think we are helping. History has shown us, that most often, we are merely helping ourselves.
I find that the first step is admitting and acknowledging that these issues exist and that they are complicated and scary. It makes me aware of the danger of my privilege in everything that I do.

So now onto beliefs. You make a distinction between believers and non-believers. I think that everything is a belief. Science is one belief, God is another. Personally, I believe that they are the same thing. They are human answers to something bigger than we are. Ultimately though, if we don't see ourselves as part of the whole (God or science), we miss the point. While we can't prove that Noah's arc really happened any more than we can prove that we come from aliens, what we can do is look at what the story teaches us and why it might be important to remember it and keep it alive. When we do that, it doesn't matter if it happened or not anyway. It doesn't matter if its true because that's not the point. The point is, what does the story invoke us to do, to be, to become? What we do with the information makes it as 'real' as anything else.

Question said...

Which leads me to think about the notion of truth. Truth is 'relative' because we all have different perspectives. Any one event might have multiple meanings or descriptions depending on who records or tells it. Historically, this narrative has been reduced to the white mans tale. For instance, I didn't learn that Columbus didn't really 'discover' American until very late in my education because the "facts" in the history books told me that in 1492 he sailed the ocean blue and was a hero because he discovered all this uninhabited land. Meanwhile, the Native American version of this same tale is one of a lost man landing on their homeland and murdering and displacing them until it was suitable for his people. Which version is the 'truth'? Is it the one in the history books or the one told through oral narrative? It's impossible to know- but we can always seek to hear as many perspectives as possible and then ultimately we have to chose which one we 'believe'. The same goes with any version of history, including the bible. Have you ever read 'The Red Tent'? It is the story of the matriarchs in the bible told from a female perspective. Its beautiful and rich and full of new interpretations. They may not be the 'true' bible, but they are certainly worthy voices to add to the mix. History casts a shadow on that which it excludes. The philosophers recognize this and don't all discount religion, but most see the narratives of one version and seek to uncover other potential narratives by exploring the other 'truths' that lay hidden behind silenced human behavior.

The issue that comes up with Christianity is not the faith itself, but instead the way that it has historically used its name and power to claim truths for others. You may not do this personally, but just like not being personally racist doesn't excuse you from white privilege that institutionally keeps people of color down, being a card carrying christian makes you a member of an institution that has at times used its 'truths' in ways that do more harm than good. I am not excusing myself here- I am a member of academic institutions that have scary historical backgrounds as well- my point is that we need to be aware of these histories and talk about them a lot in order to make sure we aren't accidentally repeating them.

Question said...

Your narrative of finding Christianity again at a point when you really needed it, is lovely. It is a personal narrative of belief however, and as I said earlier, the privilege of whiteness in Africa (because of its history of oppression) entitles your beliefs to more power or 'truth' than that of the people whose country you are visiting.
To that point, I didn't gather that Chioke was advocating that Africa revert to its 'traditions' so much (in fact, I would argue that to convert cultures back to their 'traditions' when so many identify as christians now, would be just as violent as the missionary conversions in the first place)- instead I gathered that Chioke's point was that as an African American, the sense of displacement and never being 'normal' is similar to that of the African in Africa today, except for that they never left 'home'- so this is deeply troubling.

In the end, I don't think Chioke was ever trying to test your faith as a Christian, but instead to question some of the quieter, internalized ways that privilege works itself into work that we intend to be helpful but can in fact be harmful. A lot of what you guys are saying is the same (which is probably why you are friends). I loved when you said that we cannot reach our fullest potential without help. For me, whether that help is God, or Kant or Oprah, it is that which inspires us to be engaged and proactive human beings that we should follow- just always with an eye to the shadow sides of the institutions which house those 'helpers'. If we ignore the shadow sides, they will not go away, they will just grow deeper and darker, the patterns continuing. Instead, we have an opportunity to bring these issues to light and in doing so, create real and powerful change.

With warmth,
Rachel

Nic Nice said...

Rachel, is there a better way for us to continue this conversation? What I mean is, maybe I can post a response to your comment(s) and then you could begin to post your responses to my posts via your blog? I'm assuming your blog is the Midwives in dialog with medicine one that Chioke has a link to on his blog page. Let me know.

Otherwise, i appreciate your comment(s) and I will get back to you as soon as I know what's best for continuing.

Nic

Question said...

Hey Nic,

You can reach me by email: Rachel@earth-birth.com or in blog land- yes the midwife in dialogue blog is mine but I don't update it often.

Warmly,
Rachel

Drew said...

Hello Nic, I hope you are healthy and happy in Africa. I finally made it a priority to check out your blog and have spent the last hour or so concentrating on you and Chism's healthy and thorough dialogue.

While I don't have the time today to respond as thoroughly as I'd like, I do want to exercise my unfortunately substantial pride and clarify the statements I read which referred to me, and then make a small footnote on the conversation as a whole.

I would like it to be made clear that I do not believe that aliens helped build the monuments of the ancient world (Mayans/Egyptians/etc.). However, what I DID say was that I found it hard to believe they could have built so many amazing temples of such large stones and of such astronomically and mathematically precise proportions all without any metal tools, wheels, or
beasts of burden. I did also say that I believed it very possible that beings from another galaxy exist and could be here now and subsequently their presence POSSIBLY effected the cultures of antiquity as I believe they may effect it today, but that ultimately: I don't know. I think a direct quote from me that evening was, "who knows? And who cares? We're WAY off subject anyhow." ...Just wanted to rectify your current conversation as far as my name was concerned.

That being said, I thoroughly enjoyed the dicourse between the two of you and plan to read some of the older posts and respond more thoroughly soon. I will admit that Chioke's remarks were more melodic and easily digested than yours, but that is because i generally, whole-heartedly agree with him and his processes, as I understand them, and disagree even more completely with you as a result of my more thorough knowledge of christian and colonial practices and a lack of patience on my part and the anger I unfortunately harbor towards the state and the any institution called "the state" or "the church". I hope to be rid of both maladies in the near future... my impatience and my anger... hahaha! The state and the church would be nice, but I can only do so much, right?

Anyhow, despite or vast differences of opinion, I WOULD like to attempt to have constructive discussions with you again in the future. I hope that my unwillingness to continue that particular conversation at that particular stormy evening wasn't taken to mean that I see rational discussion with you as impossible in perpetuity, so much as it was my own short-comings at the moment in the aforementioned two fields of discipline.

Let it be known that I love nothing more than to have a healthy difference of opinion and logical and rational sharing of ideas between friends... I thrive off of it, as a matter of fact; and am starved for it.

So, on that note I'll leave you to it for now and will return shortly to do one of the things I do best: offer my two cents!

Take it easy, brother.

-Drew

Nic Nice said...

Drew,

Welcome to the conversation. I want to apologize if I quoted you incorrectly. If you recall it was somewhere 2 am and yes, I now do remember that it was raining cats and dogs. That's one thing that I miss about Florida, sort of.

Thank you for clarifying. Because I did mention you in the blog, is a big reason why I wanted you to see it. Also, I too enjoy these honest conversations.

Now, I want to say that although you've brought clarity to what you said and meant that night. I want to say, that it's the unbelief that is still the main point of why I brought it up. The fact that these temples are there, in our face, it's still difficult for one to believe that it was done so long ago without the machinery and knowledge that we have now. So, to ask someone to believe in something even greater and not able to be seen is just too much to ask, I guess.

Yet, I would venture to say that we all chose to believe things that cannot be proven with empirical evidence and at the same time chose not to believe or believe in other things.

About the lack of patience and Anger that you harbor towards the state and church. The state and church or any institution called such are made up of what? People, these are people that are like you and I. Not one person ever to exist is without fault. People have been killing and oppressing other people since the beginning. I'm not saying it's right, I believe that we are born with a general sense of right and wrong. Maybe I could say, it's something like instinct. Somewhere along the way people become corrupted and begin to act outside of what we generally would consider right or good. Selfishness, is probably the root to most of these evils. People become dangerous when they think of themselves above others.

Religion that God our Father accepts as pure and faultless is this: to look after orphans and widows in their distress and to keep oneself from being polluted by the world. Jas 1:27

"Be devoted to one another in brotherly love. Honor one another above yourselves. Rom 12:10